poe-gen-testsp - Online in the Cloud

PROGRAM:

NAME

poe-gen-tests - generate standard POE tests for third-party modules

SYNOPSIS

poe-gen-tests --dirbase t/loops \
--loop Glib \
--loop Kqueue \
--loop Event::Lib \
--loop POE::XS::Loop::Poll

DESCRIPTION

This program and the accompanying POE::Test::Loop::* modules make up POE's tests for
POE::Loop subclasses. These tests are designed to run identically regardless of the
current event loop. POE uses them to test the event loops it bundles:

POE::Loop::Gtk
POE::Loop::IO_Poll (--loop IO::Poll)
POE::Loop::Tk
POE::Loop::Event
POE::Loop::Select

Developers of other POE::Loop modules are encouraged use this package to generate over 420
comprehensive tests for their own work.

USAGE

poe-gen-tests creates test files for one or more event loops beneath the directory
specified in --dirbase. For example,

poe-gen-tests --dirbase t/loops --loop Select

generates the following test files:

t/loops/select/all_errors.t
t/loops/select/comp_tcp.t
t/loops/select/comp_tcp_concurrent.t
t/loops/select/connect_errors.t
t/loops/select/k_alarms.t
t/loops/select/k_aliases.t
t/loops/select/k_detach.t
t/loops/select/k_selects.t
t/loops/select/k_sig_child.t
t/loops/select/k_signals.t
t/loops/select/k_signals_rerun.t
t/loops/select/sbk_signal_init.t
t/loops/select/ses_nfa.t
t/loops/select/ses_session.t
t/loops/select/wheel_accept.t
t/loops/select/wheel_curses.t
t/loops/select/wheel_readline.t
t/loops/select/wheel_readwrite.t
t/loops/select/wheel_run.t
t/loops/select/wheel_sf_ipv6.t
t/loops/select/wheel_sf_tcp.t
t/loops/select/wheel_sf_udp.t
t/loops/select/wheel_sf_unix.t
t/loops/select/wheel_tail.t

The --loop parameter is either a POE::Loop::... class name or the event loop class that
will complete the POE::Loop::... package name.

poe-gen-tests --dirbase t/loops --loop Event::Lib
poe-gen-tests --dirbase t/loops --loop POE::Loop::Event_Lib

poe-gen-tests looks for a "=for poe_tests" or "=begin poe_tests" section within the
POE::Loop class being tested. If defined, this section should include a single function,
skip_tests(), that determines whether any given test should be skipped.

Please see perlpod for syntax for "=for" and "=begin". Also see PODDITIES for notable
differences between POE::Test::Loop's POD support and the standard.

skip_tests() is called with one parameter, the base name of the test about to be executed.
It returns false if the test should run, or a message that will be displayed to the user
explaining why the test will be skipped. This message is passed directly to Test::More's
plan() along with "skip_all". The logic is essentially:

if (my $why = skip_tests("k_signals_rerun")) {
plan skip_all => $why;
}

skip_tests() should load any modules required by the event loop. See most of the examples
below.

Example poe_tests Directives
POE::Loop::Event checks whether the Event module exists and can be loaded, then whether
specific tests can run under specific operating systems.

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests {
return "Event tests require the Event module" if (
do { eval "use Event"; $@ }
);
my $test_name = shift;
if ($test_name eq "k_signals_rerun" and $^O eq "MSWin32") {
return "This test crashes Perl when run with Tk on $^O";
}
if ($test_name eq "wheel_readline" and $^O eq "darwin") {
return "Event skips two of its own tests for the same reason";
}
}

POE::Loop::Gtk checks whether DISPLAY is set, which implies that X is running. It then
checks whether Gtk is available, loadable, and safely initializable before skipping
specific tests.

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests {
my $test_name = shift;
return "Gtk needs a DISPLAY (set one today, okay?)" unless (
defined $ENV{DISPLAY} and length $ENV{DISPLAY}
);
return "Gtk tests require the Gtk module" if do { eval "use Gtk"; $@ };
return "Gtk init failed. Is DISPLAY valid?" unless defined Gtk->init_check;
if ($test_name eq "z_rt39872_sigchld_stop") {
return "Gdk crashes";
}
return;
}

POE::Loop::IO_Poll checks for system compatibility before verifying that IO::Poll is
available and loadable.

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests {
return "IO::Poll is not 100% compatible with $^O" if $^O eq "MSWin32";
return "IO::Poll tests require the IO::Poll module" if (
do { eval "use IO::Poll"; $@ }
);
}

POE::Loop::Select has no specific requirements.

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests { return }

POE::Loop::Tk needs an X display (except on Windows). Tk is not safe for fork(), so skip
tests that require forking. And finally, check whether the Tk module is available,
loadable, and runnable.

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests {
return "Tk needs a DISPLAY (set one today, okay?)" unless (
(defined $ENV{DISPLAY} and length $ENV{DISPLAY}) or $^O eq "MSWin32"
);
my $test_name = shift;
if ($test_name eq "k_signals_rerun" and $^O eq "MSWin32") {
return "This test crashes Perl when run with Tk on $^O";
}
return "Tk tests require the Tk module" if do { eval "use Tk"; $@ };
my $m = eval { Tk::MainWindow->new() };
if ($@) {
my $why = $@;
$why =~ s/ at .*//;
return "Tk couldn't be initialized: $why";
}
return;
}

INSTALL SCRIPT INTEGRATION

The POE::Loop tests started out as part of the POE distribution. All the recommendations
and examples that follow are written and tested against ExtUtils::MakeMaker because that's
what POE uses. Please adjust these recipes according to your taste and preference.

Calling the Test Generator
Tests need to be generated prior to the user or CPAN shell running "make test". A tidy
way to do this might be to create a new Makefile target and include that as a dependency
for "make test". POE takes a simpler approach, calling the script from its Makefile.PL:

system(
$^X, "poe-gen-tests", "--dirbase", "t/30_loops",
"--loop", "Event", "--loop", "Gtk", "--loop", "IO::Poll",
"--loop", "Select", "--loop", "Tk",
) and die $!;

The previous approach generates tests at install time, so it's not necessary to include
the generated files in the MANIFEST. Test directories should also be excluded from the
MANIFEST. poe-gen-tests will create the necessary paths.

It's also possible to generate the tests prior to "make dist". The distribution's
MANIFEST must include the generated files in this case.

Most people will not need to add the generated tests to their repositories.

Running the Tests

By default, ExtUtils::MakeMaker generates Makefiles that only run tests matching t/*.t.
However authors are allowed to specify other test locations. Add the following parameter
to WriteMakefile() so that the tests generated above will be executed:

tests => {
TESTS => "t/*.t t/30_loops/*/*.t",
}

CLEANING UP

Makefiles will not clean up files that aren't present in the MANIFEST. This includes
tests generated at install time. If this bothers you, you'll need to add directives to
include the generated tests in the "clean" and "distclean" targets.

clean => {
FILES => "t/30_loops/*/* t/30_loops/*",
}

This assumes the "t/30_loops" directory contains only generated tests. It's recommended
that generated and hand-coded tests not coexist in the same directory.

It seems like a good idea to delete the deeper directories and files before their parents.

Skipping Network Tests

Some generated tests require a network to be present and accessible. Those tests will be
skipped unless the file "run_network_tests" is present in the main distribution directory.
You can include that file in your distribution's tarball, but it's better create it at
install time after asking the user. Here's how POE does it. Naturally you're free to do
it some other way.

# Switch to default behavior if STDIN isn't a tty.

unless (-t STDIN) {
warn(
"\n",
"=============================================\n\n",
"STDIN is not a terminal. Assuming --default.\n\n",
"=============================================\n\n",
);
push @ARGV, "--default";
}

# Remind the user she can use --default.

unless (grep /^--default$/, @ARGV) {
warn(
"\n",
"================================================\n\n",
"Prompts may be bypassed with the --default flag.\n\n",
"================================================\n\n",
);
}

# Should we run the network tests?

my $prompt = (
"Some of POE's tests require a functional network.\n" .
"You can skip these tests if you'd like.\n\n" .
"Would you like to skip the network tests?"
);

my $ret = "n";
if (grep /^--default$/, @ARGV) {
print $prompt, " [$ret] $ret\n\n";
}
else {
$ret = prompt($prompt, "n");
}

my $marker = 'run_network_tests';
unlink $marker;
unless ($ret =~ /^Y$/i) {
open(TOUCH,"+>$marker") and close TOUCH;
}

print "\n";

Skipping Other Tests

POE's loop tests will enable or disable tests based on the event loop's capabilities.
Distributions and event loops may set these variables to signal which tests are okay to
run.

POE_LOOP_USES_POLL
Some platforms do not support poll() on certain kinds of filehandles. Event loops that
use poll() should set this environment variable to a true value. It will cause the tests
to skip this troublesome combination.

PODDITIES
Previous versions of POE::Test::Loops documented "=for poe_tests" sections terminated by
=cut and containing blank lines. This is incorrect POD syntax, and it's the reason the
skip_tests() functions showed up in perldoc and on search.cpan.org. The following syntax
is wrong and should not have been used. I'm so sorry.

=for poe_tests

sub skip_tests { ... }

=cut

The proper syntax is to terminate "=for poe_tests" with a blank line:

=for poe_tests
sub skip_tests {
...
}

Multi-line tests containing blank lines can be specified using POD's "=begin poe_tests"
terminated by "=end poe_tests".

=begin poe_tests

sub skip_tests {
...
}

=end poe_tests

All three syntaxes above are supported as of POE::Test::Loops version 1.034. The
incorrect =for syntax is deprecated and will be removed in some future release.

Use poe-gen-testsp online using onworks.net services