OnWorks favicon

makepp_tutorial - Online in the Cloud

Run makepp_tutorial in OnWorks free hosting provider over Ubuntu Online, Fedora Online, Windows online emulator or MAC OS online emulator

This is the command makepp_tutorial that can be run in the OnWorks free hosting provider using one of our multiple free online workstations such as Ubuntu Online, Fedora Online, Windows online emulator or MAC OS online emulator



makepp_tutorial -- Tutorial on writing makefiles


A makefile is the set of instructions that you use to tell makepp how to build your
program. Makepp can accept most makefiles written for the standard Unix make, but if
you're starting from scratch, it is often much simpler to use some of makepp's advanced
features. This is an introduction for writing makefiles that are specific to makepp.

If you already know a lot about writing makefiles, you might want to at least peruse the
later sections of this file because they show the preferred way to do things with makepp,
which is often different from the traditional way to do it with make. Another source of
examples and advice on writing makefiles for makepp is makepp_cookbook.

Building a program from its source files can be a complicated and time-consuming
operation. The commands are too long to be typed in manually every time. However, a
straightforward shell script is seldom used for compiling a program, because it's too
time-consuming to recompile all modules when only one of them has changed.

However, it's too error-prone to allow a human to tell the computer which files need to be
recompiled. Forgetting to recompile a file can mean hours of frustrating debugging. A
reliable automatic tool is necessary for determining exactly which modules need

Makepp (short for Make-plus-plus, or make++) is a tool for solving exactly this problem.
It is an improvement on the make program, a standard tool that has been around for many
years. It relies either on its own builtin knowledge (in very simple cases), or on a file
called a Makefile that contains a detailed recipe for building the program.

Usually, the input files are program source code, and the output files are executables,
but makepp doesn't care what they are. You can use a makefile to control any kind of
procedure where you need to selectively execute certain commands depending on which files
have changed. You could, for example, use makepp to do data analysis, where your input
files are raw data and analysis programs, and your output files are processed data or
graphs or whatever. Makepp will figure out which of the processed data files need to be
updated whenever some of the data files or analysis programs change. The examples in this
introduction will assume you are building an executable program from source code, but you
can do a lot more with makepp than just that if you use your imagination.

If your program consists of a single module, you probably don't need makepp, because you
know that any change that you make requires recompiling that module. However, if your
program consists of even just two modules, then you will definitely want to use a program
like makepp.

Do I need a makefile?
If your program is relatively simple and doesn't require anything particularly special,
makepp may already know how to build it without your explicitly giving instructions. For
example, suppose you have a program in a single source file, called "test.c". You can
just type "makepp test" and your program will build like this:

% makepp test
makepp: Entering directory `/somewhere/or/other'
gcc -g -Wall -c test.c -o test.o
gcc -g -Wall test.o -o test
Warning: on Unix, to run a program called 'test', you must type
rather than just 'test'.

These are the basic commands needed to compile a program on Unix. If these commands don't
make any sense to you, see makepp_tutorial_compilation.

Makepp contains builtin rules for C, C++, and Fortran.

Makepp can sometimes figure out how to compile programs that are contained in more than
one source file, or programs that must be linked with various system libraries. It does
this by guessing which source files and libraries you need based on the files that you
include. The actual algorithm is too complicated to discuss here in a tutorial (but see
makepp_builtin); you can try it, and if it doesn't work automatically for you, you need to
write your own makefile.

By default, for C and C++, makepp compiles the program with debug information and without
optimization. If you want to turn on optimization so that your program runs faster,
change the command line to:

makepp CFLAGS=-O2 test

If you're compiling C++ instead of C, use "CXXFLAGS=-O2" instead of "CFLAGS=-O2". For a
complete list of other options you can configure without writing a makefile, see

Makepp's builtin rules are somewhat more powerful than the standard Unix make, but if you
write programs of any complexity, it's likely that you'll need a makefile eventually to
tell makepp what to do.

If you are not familiar with Unix compilation commands, it may be helpful at this point to
read makepp_tutorial_compilation for a description of what these cryptic Unix compilation
commands do.

A simple makefile
Suppose you are writing a C++ program which has two source modules, "processing.cxx" and
"gui.cxx", along with numerous include files. If you were to build your program from
scratch, you would need to execute something like these commands:

c++ -c processing.cxx -o processing.o
c++ -c gui.cxx -o gui.o
c++ processing.o gui.o -o my_program

The first two commands are compilation commands, and the third invokes the linker to
combine the two object files into a single executable. If you make changes to "gui.cxx"
but not to "processing.cxx", then you don't need to reexecute the first command, but you
do need to execute the last two commands. makepp can figure this out for you

(If you've never worked with make before, you may be thinking that you could combine the
above three commands into a single command, like this:

c++ processing.cxx gui.cxx -o my_program

When you omit the "-c" option to the compiler, it combines the compilation and linking
step. This is often quite convenient when you are not writing a makefile. However, it's
not a good idea to do this in a makefile, because it always recompiles both modules even
if one of them hasn't changed, and this can take a significant amount of extra time.)

In order to use makepp to control the build process, you'll need to write a makefile. The
makefile is a text file that contains the recipe for building your program. It usually
resides in the same directory as the sources, and it is usually called "Makeppfile",
"Makefile" or, only at the root of your build tree "RootMakeppfile".

Each one of these commands should be a separate rule in a makefile. A rule is an
instruction for building one or more output files from one or more input files. Makepp
determines which rules need to be reexecuted by determining whether any of the input files
for a rule have changed since the last time the rule was executed.

A rule has a syntax like this:

output_filenames : input_filenames

The first line of the rule contains a space-separated list of output files, followed by a
colon, followed by a space-separated list of input files. The output files are also
called targets, and the input files are also called dependencies; we say that the target
file depends on the dependencies, because if any of the dependencies change, the target
must be rebuilt.

The remaining lines of the rule (the actions) are shell commands to be executed. Each
action must be indented with at least one space (traditional make requires a tab
character). Usually, there's just one action line, but there can be as many as you want;
each line is executed sequentially, and if any one of them fails, the remainder are not
executed. The rule ends at the first line which is not indented.

Some or all of the actions may also be Perl statements. These may be on a single line and
surrounded by "perl { ... }". Or they may span several lines, in which case the braces
must be doubled, "perl {{ ... }}".

You can place the rules in any order in the makefile, but it is traditional to write the
rule that links the program first, followed by the compilation rules. One reason for this
is that if you simply type ""makepp"", then makepp attempts to build the first target in
the file, which means that it will build your whole program and not just a piece of it.
(If you want to build something other than the first target, you have to specify the name
of the target on the command line, e.g., ""makepp processing.o"".)

The above compilation commands should be written as three separate rules. A makefile for
building this program could look like this:

# Link command:
my_program: processing.o gui.o
c++ processing.o gui.o -o my_program
perl {{
print "my_program is built\n";

# Compilation commands:
processing.o: processing.cxx
c++ -c processing.cxx -o processing.o

gui.o: gui.cxx
c++ -c gui.cxx -o gui.o

(Characters on a line following a "#" are ignored; they are just comments. You do not
need the ""# Link command:"" comment in the makefile at all.)

To use this makefile, simply cd to the directory and type ""makepp"". Makepp will attempt
to build the first target in the makefile, which is "my_program". (If you don't want it
to build the first target, then you have to supply a the name of the target you actually
want to build on the command line.)

When makepp attempts to build "my_program", it realizes that it first must build
"processing.o" and "gui.o" before it can execute the link command. So it looks at the
other rules in the makefile to determine how to build these.

In order to build "processing.o", makepp uses the second rule. Since "processing.o"
depends on "processing.cxx", makepp will also try to make "processing.cxx". There is no
rule to make "processing.cxx"; it must already exist.

Makepp checks whether "processing.cxx" has changed since the last time "processing.o" was
built. By default, it determines this by looking at the dates on the file. Makepp
remembers what the date of "processing.cxx" was the last time "processing.o" was made by
storing it in a separate file (in a subdirectory called ".makepp"). Makepp will execute
the actions to build the target if any of the following is true:

· The target does not exist.

· The target exists, but makepp does not have any information about the last build.

· The date on any input file has changed since the last build, and there is a
significant difference in the input file. For C or C++ files this means a change
other than whitespace or within comments.

· The date on any target has changed since the last build, and there is a difference in
the target file.

· The actions have changed since the last build.

· The last build occurred on a different architecture (different CPU type or operating
system type).

· Any environment variable listed on the rule has changed in value.

It might seem a little funny that makepp executes the action if either the output file or
the input files have changed since the last build. Makepp is designed to guarantee that
your build is correct, according to the commands in the makefile. If you go and modify
the file yourself, then makepp can't guarantee that the modified file is actually correct,
so it insists on rebuilding. (For more information on how makepp decides whether to
rebuild, and how you can control this, see makepp_signatures and makepp_command.)

Now "processing.o" might not depend only on "processing.cxx"; if "processing.cxx" includes
any ".h" files, then it needs to be recompiled if any of those ".h" files has changed,
even if "processing.cxx" itself has not changed. You could modify the rule like this:

# Unnecessary listing of .h files
processing.o: processing.cxx processing.h simple_vector.h list.h
c++ -c processing.cxx -o processing.o

However, it is a real nuisance to modify the makefile every time you change the list of
files that are included, and it is also extremely error prone. You would not only have to
list the files that "processing.cxx" includes, but also all the files that those files
include, etc. You don't have to do this. Makepp is smart enough to check for include
files automatically. Any time it sees a command that looks like a C or C++ compilation
(by looking at the first word of the action), it reads in the source files looking for
"#include" directives. It knows where to look for include files by parsing your compiler
command line for "-I" options . Any files which are included are automatically added to
the dependency list, and any files which those include. If any of them has changed, the
file will be recompiled.

Once makepp knows that "processing.o" is up to date, it then determines whether "gui.o"
needs to be rebuilt by applying the same procedure to the third rule. When both
"processing.o" and "gui.o" are known to be built correctly, then makepp applies the same
procedure to see if the link command needs to be reexecuted.

The above makefile will work, but even for this simple problem, an experienced user is not
likely to write his makefile this way. Several improvements are discussed in the next

Using variables

So far, our makefile for compiling our program of two modules looks like this:

# Link command:
my_program: processing.o gui.o
c++ processing.o gui.o -o my_program

# Compilation commands:
processing.o: processing.cxx
c++ -c processing.cxx -o processing.o

gui.o: gui.cxx
c++ -c gui.cxx -o gui.o

This works wonderfully, but suppose now we want to change some compilation options. Or
maybe we want to use a different compiler. We'd have to change all three compilation

Similarly, suppose we want to change the list of modules to compile. We'd have to change
it in two places.

Duplication of information like this is a recipe for disaster. If you go and change your
makefile, it's pretty much guaranteed that at some point, you or someone else will forget
to change one of the places. Depending on what the change is (especially if it affects
preprocessor definitions), this can lead to subtle and hard-to-debug problems in your

The way to avoid duplication of information is to specify the information only once and
store it in a variable, which can be accessed each time the information is needed.

# Define the symbols we might want to change:
CXX := c++

OBJECTS := processing.o gui.o

my_program: $(OBJECTS)
$(CXX) $(OBJECTS) -o my_program

processing.o: processing.cxx
$(CXX) $(INCLUDES) $(CXXFLAGS) -c processing.cxx -o processing.o

gui.o: gui.cxx
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c gui.cxx -o gui.o

Here "$(CXX)" expands to be the value of the variable "CXX", and similarly for
"$(CXXFLAGS)" and "$(OBJECTS)". Now we can just change one line in the makefile, and all
relevant compilation commands are affected.

In fact, we don't even need to change the makefile to change compilation options.
Assignments specified on the command line override assignments in the makefile. For
example, we could type this to the shell:

makepp CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"

which overrides the setting of "CXXFLAGS" in the makefile. It is as if the makefile
contained the line

CXXFLAGS := -g -O2

instead of the definition it does contain.

It might not at all be useful to be able to override these things for your own
development, but if you distribute your sources to other people, they might appreciate it.

Variable names are case sensitive (e.g., "OBJECTS" is different from "objects"). Usually
people write most variables in upper case only, but you don't have to.

If you need to put a literal dollar sign into a rule action, write it with a double dollar
sign, like this:

for testfile in *.test; do run_test $$testfile; done

Conventionally, there are a few variables which you might want to set. These are just
conventions, but you will see them in a lot of makefiles.

CC := cc # The C compiler.
CFLAGS := -g # C compilation options which relate to
# optimization or debugging (usually
# just -g or -O). Usually this wouldn't
# include -I options to specify the
# include directories, because then you
# couldn't override it on the command line
# easily as in the above example.
CXX := c++ # The C++ compiler. (Sometimes "CPP" instead
# of CXX.)
CXXFLAGS := -g # C++ compilation options related to
# optimization or debugging (-O or -g).
F77 := f77 # The Fortran compiler.
FFLAGS := # Optimization flags for Fortran.

Makepp will guess appropriate values for some of these variables if you don't specify them
(see makepp_builtin), but it is usually best to set them explicitly--it makes it easier on
anyone reading your makefile.

There are a lot more extremely powerful things you can do with variables, but first we
need to explain some more things about makefiles.

Pattern rules

Having one rule for each compilation command is fine when there are only a few files, but
what if your program consists of dozens of source files? Most of them have to be compiled
with very similar commands. It is tedious to type in a separate rule for each source
file, and then if you decide to change the rules, you have to change the makefile in a
dozen places. A better solution to this problem is to use a pattern rule.

A pattern rule is a concise way of specifying a rule for many files at once. The rule
will depend on the file names, but usually it depends on them in a simple way. You
specify a pattern by using the "%" wildcard. When present in the dependency list, "%"
matches any string of any length; when present in the list of targets, "%" stands for the
string that "%" in the dependency list matched.

The following pattern rule will take any ".c" file and compile it into a ".o" file:

%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c $(input) -o $(output)

(This assumes that you have the variables "CC", "CFLAGS", and "INCLUDES" defined to be
something suitable. Makepp will guess a value for "CC" and "CFLAGS".)

The first line of the rule says that it applies to every possible input file that matches
the pattern "%.c". These ".c" files can be transformed into the corresponding ".o" file
using the specified actions.

The action of rule is quite similar to the other actions we've seen previously, except
that it uses automatic variables. An automatic variable is a variable whose value is
automatically set by makepp depending on the rule that it appears in. The most useful
automatic variables are:

The name of the first input file. In this rule, this would be the file that matches
the "%.c" pattern. "$(dependency)" is a synonym for "$(input)". In older makefiles,
you will also see the cryptic symbol $< used as well.

The name of the first output file. In this rule, this would be the file that matches
the "%.o" pattern. "$(target)" and $@ are synonyms.

The name of all explicitly listed input files. In this case, since there is only one,
"$(inputs)" is equivalent to "$(input)". "$(dependencies)" and $^ are synonyms.

The name of all explicitly listed targets. In this case, since there is only one,
"$(outputs)" is equivalent to "$(output)". "$(targets)" is a synonym for

Note that these variables are lower case.

You can use these automatic variables even for non-pattern rules. This avoids repeating
target filenames.

You can actually do considerably more complicated things with pattern rules. For example,

# Put the object files into a separate directory:
objects/%.o: %.cpp
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

# Run a preprocessor to make source files:
moc_%.cxx: %.h
$(MOC) $(input) -o $(output)

Using pattern rules and automatic variables, we'd probably rewrite our makefile for our
simple program like this:

CXX := c++
INCLUDES := -I. # This would contain any -I options to the
# compiler, if there are any.
LIBS := -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 # Contains libraries we need to link in.
OBJECTS := processing.o gui.o

my_program: $(OBJECTS)
$(CXX) $(inputs) -o $(output) $(LIBS)

%.o: %.cxx
$(CXX) $(INCLUDES) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

Now we don't have to have an explicit rule for each object file we need to produce. If we
want to add another module to our program, we only have to change the one line that
defines the "OBJECTS" variable. Note that this makefile is now much more concise than our
original makefile. Each piece of information occurs only once so there is no possibility
of making a mistake by changing information in one place and forgetting to change it in

When you use pattern rules, it's not uncommon for there to be two different rules that can
produce the same file. If both rules are pattern rules, then the one that occurs later in
the makefile is actually used. If one rule is a pattern rule, and the other is an
explicit rule (one that actually names the target file explicitly), then the explicit rule
is used. This is often helpful if you want to compile most modules with the same command,
but there is one module that needs slightly different compilation options, as shown in
this makefile fragment:

CXXFLAGS := -g -O2
FAST_CXXFLAGS := -DNO_DEBUG -O6 -malign-double -funroll-all-loops

%.o: %.cpp
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

time_critical_subs.o: time_critical_subs.cpp
$(CXX) $(FAST_CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

There is also another syntax that can be more convenient for affecting compilation options
for just one or a few targets. It is possible to tell makepp that a variable should have
a different value for certain specific targets. In this example, it would look like this:

CXXFLAGS := -g -O2
FAST_CXXFLAGS := -DNO_DEBUG -O6 -malign-double -funroll-all-loops

%.o: %.cpp
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

time_critical_subs.o: CXXFLAGS := $(FAST_CXXFLAGS)

In general, if you specify a variable name after a list of targets, then it takes a
different value when the build command for those targets is being determined.

If you find yourself wanting to do something with patterns that isn't expressed easily
using the "%" wildcard, makepp has another syntax which is somewhat harder to read, but
considerably more powerful. See the foreach clause in rules for more details.

Makepp actually has builtin rules for compiling C or C++ or Fortran code, which are
available if you don't override them with your own rules. The builtin rules are almost
identical to the examples above. Most makefiles contain pattern rules for compilation,
but you can depend on the builtin rules if you want.

Phony targets
Often it is convenient to put commands into the makefile that don't actually build a file,
but are somehow logically associated with the build process. For example, a very common
procedure in makefiles is something like this:


install: our_program
&install -m 0755 our_program $(prefix)/bin
&install -m 0644 $(wildcard *.png) $(prefix)/share/our_program/icons

.PHONY: install

When someone types "makepp install", then makepp first builds "our_program", then runs the
commands associated with the install target. The "install" command simply copies its
arguments to the specified directory, and sets the file's protection to the indicated
value. So it copies our_program into /usr/local/bin, and some associated data files into
/usr/local/share/our_program/icons. But this doesn't create a file called "install" in
the current directory.

The command itself, &install, is preceded by an ampersand. This means that it is not a
Shell command, but a similar builtin command. (You see the difference in that you need
the "$(wildcard)" function, because the Shell is not expanding it for you.) Makepp has
quite a few of these, both for portability reasons -- "install", when it is at all
present, differs wildly, and even trivial commands like "echo" do -- and performance. See
the builtin commands for more details.

The "install" target here is called a phony target because makepp treats it as if it were
a real file, but it is not actually a file, it's just a trick for forcing makepp to build
its dependencies and then run some commands.

That's what the line

.PHONY: install

is for. It tells makepp that it really shouldn't expect the file "./install" to exist
after the commands have executed. If you forget the phony declaration, then makepp will
expect the file "install" to exist after executing the commands, and it will complain
loudly if it does not.

You can also write the phony declaration like this:
$(phony install): our_program

and then omit the ".PHONY: install" line. This means that you can declare the target as
phony on the same line as you define it, which may make your makefiles more readable.

Phony targets are extremely common in makefiles. In almost all makefiles, the first
target is the phony target "all", like this:

$(phony all): program1 program2 program3

If no target is specified on the command line, makepp attempts to build the first target
in the file. If your makefile makes more than just one program, you most likely want to
build all of the programs by default. In this example, if the programmer just types
"makepp" without any arguments, makepp attempts to build "all", which forces it to build
all three programs from this directory.

Here is a sample makefile fragment that illustrates some commonly used phony targets:

PROGRAMS := combobulator discombobulator

$(phony all): $(PROGRAMS) # All is the first target, so it's the default.

combobulator: $(COMBOBULATOR_OBJS)
$(CXX) $(inputs) -o $(output)

discombobulator: $(DISCOMBOBULATOR_OBJS)
$(CXX) $(inputs) -o $(output)

# This target makes sure everything is compiled, and then puts the
# programs into a place where everyone can access them. We make the
# directories if they don't exist yet. We don't use &mkdir, because
# &install keeps track of everything it does, so &uninstall can later
# undo this.
prefix := /usr/local

$(phony install): all
&install -d $(prefix)/bin $(prefix)/share/combobulate
&install -m 0755 $(PROGRAMS) $(prefix)/bin
&install -m 0644 $(wildcard *.xbm) $(prefix)/share/combobulate

# This target makes a source distribution for shipping out to someone.
VERSION := 3.14

$(phony distribution):
rm -rf combobulate-$(VERSION) # Get rid of previous junk, if any.
&mkdir combobulate-$(VERSION)
&cp -l $(wildcard *.c *.h) Makefile README INSTALL combobulate-$(VERSION)
tar cf - combobulate-$(VERSION) | gzip -9c > combobulate-$(VERSION).tar.gz
rm -rf combobulate-$(VERSION)

# This target runs regression tests to make sure the program(s) are
# doing what they are supposed to do.
$(phony test): $(PROGRAMS)
noecho for testfile in *.test; do \
./combobulate $$testfile | ./discombobulate - > junk_output; \
if cmp -s junk_output $$testfile; then \
echo passed $$testfile; \
else \
echo failed $$testfile; \
fi; \
# If "noecho" is the first word of the action, the action itself is not
# printed before it is executed. In this case, printing the action
# would merely clutter up the screen so it is very common to suppress
# printing for such long commands.
# Note the use of the double dollar sign to pass a single dollar sign to
# the shell. Note also the backslashes at the end of a line to indicate
# that a shell command continues to the next line.

Working with several directories
If your program grows to a substantial size, or if it uses libraries that need to be built
but should be kept separate, it is quite likely that you have split up your sources into
several directories. One of the main motivations for writing makepp was to make dealing
with several directories much easier than with the standard make utility. If you're
familiar with the standard Unix make, you'll notice that with makepp, you don't have to
mess around with ugly complexities like recursive invocations of make.

With makepp, you simply put a separate makefile in each directory that builds the relevant
files in that directory. When a makefile refers to files whose build commands are in
different makefiles, makepp automatically finds the appropriate build rules in the other
makefiles. All actions in each makefile are executed with the current directory set to be
the directory containing the makefile, so each makefile can be written independently of
all the others. No makefile has to know anything about the other makefiles; it does not
even have to tell makepp to load the rules from those other makefiles.

When you've written your makefiles, cd to the directory that contains your main program,
and type "makepp" just like you usually would. Makepp will load in the makefile from that
directory. It will notice that this makefile refers to files in other directories, and it
will examine those other directories to see if there is a makefile in them. In this way,
all relevant makefiles will be loaded.

As a simple example, suppose your top level directory contains the following makefile
(suggested name is "RootMakeppfile", but "Makeppfile" will also work):

# Top level makefile:

CXX := c++
my_program: main.o goodies/libgoodies.so
$(CXX) $(inputs) -o $(output)

%.o: %.cxx
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

You would need to write a makefile in the directory "goodies" which builds
"libgoodies.so", like this:

# goodies/Makefile

CXX := c++

MODULES = candy.o chips.o licorice.o cookies.o popcorn.o spinach.o

libgoodies.so: $(MODULES)
$(CXX) -shared $(inputs) -o $(output)
# Note that the command is written assuming that
# the current directory is the subdirectory
# "goodies", not the top level subdirectory.
# Makepp cds into this directory before executing
# any commands from this makefile.

%.o: %.cxx
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -fpic -c $(input) -o $(output)

And that's all you need to do.

Any variables which you specify on the command line override the definition of the
variable in all makefiles. Thus, for example, if you type "makepp CXXFLAGS="-g"", all
modules will be recompiled for debug because the definition of "CXXFLAGS" in both
makefiles is overridden.

The directories containing other sources need not be subdirectories of the top-level
directory (as they are in this example). They can be anywhere in the file system; makepp
will automatically load a makefile from any directory that contains a file which is a
dependency of some target it is trying to build. It will also load a makefile from any
directory that is scanned by a wildcard.

Automatic loading works if files built by your makefile all reside in the same directory
as the makefile itself. If you write your makefile so that its rules produce files in a
different directory than the makefile itself, then you might have to tell makepp where to
look for the makefiles, since it doesn't have any way of guessing. You can do this using
the "load_makefile" statement in your makefile. For more information about this and other
issues related to multi-directory builds, see "Tips for multiple directories" in

One caveat: if you reference the variable "$(MAKE)" in your makefile, makepp automatically
goes into backward compatibility mode and turns off automatic loading.

Template or boilerplate files

Makepp has several other features which make life slightly easier for programmers who have
to maintain a program spanning several directories. In the above examples, you'll notice
that the definitions of the variables "CXX" and "CXXFLAGS" have to be repeated in each
makefile. It can be a nuisance to reenter the same information into every makefile, and
it could be a problem if you ever decide to change it--you may have to modify dozens of
different makefiles.

What you can do instead is to put all of the information that's common to each makefile
into a separate file, located perhaps at the top of the directory tree. Common
information usually includes variable definitions, and sometimes also pattern rules. (In
the above example, however, the pattern rules are not the same in both makefiles.) Let's
suppose you've called this file "standard_defs.mk". Then each makefile simply needs to
contain a statement like this:

include standard_defs.mk

When makepp sees this statement, it inserts the contents of the file into the makefile at
that point. The "include" statement first looks for the file in the current directory,
then in the parent of the current directory, and so on up to the top level of the file
system, so you don't actually need to specify "../standard_defs.mk" or

So we could rewrite the above makefiles to look like this. "standard_defs.mk" would exist
in the top level directory, and it might contain the following definitions:

# standard_defs.mk
CXX := c++

# We've also included a pattern rule that might be useful in one or more
# subdirectories. This pattern rule is for C compilation for putting
# things into a shared library (that's what the -fpic option is for).
%.o: %.cxx
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -fpic -c $(input) -o $(output)

Note that since the included file is actually inserted into each makefile, rules in the
included file are applied with the default directory set to the directory containing the
makefile that included the file, not the directory containing the include file.

The top level "Makefile" might look like this:

# Top level makefile
include standard_defs.mk

my_program: main.o goodies/libgoodies.so
$(CXX) $(inputs) -o $(output)

# Note that this pattern rule overrides the one found in standard_defs.mk,
# because makepp sees it later. This pattern rule is for compilation for
# a module that doesn't belong in a shared library.
%.o: %.cxx
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(input) -o $(output)

And the subdirectory's makefile might look like this:

# goodies/Makefile
include standard_defs.mk

MODULES = candy.o chips.o licorice.o cookies.o popcorn.o spinach.o

libgoodies.so: $(MODULES)
$(CXX) -shared $(inputs) -o $(output)

# We don't need the pattern rule for compilation of .cxx to .o files,
# because it's contained in standard_defs.mk.

The -F compilation option

If you run makepp from within an editor such as emacs, and you are editing sources from
several different directories, you may find that the default directory for makepp differs
depending on which file you were most recently editing. As a result, makepp may not load
the correct makefile.

What you can do to ensure that makepp always loads the correct makefile(s), no matter what
directory happens to be your current directory, is to use the "-F" command line option,
like this:

makepp -F ~/src/my_program

Makepp will first cd to the directory "~/src/my_program" before it attempts to load a

Using Wildcards
Up until this point, we've had to explicitly list all of the modules that go into a
program or a library. The previous makefile, for example, contained this line:

MODULES = candy.o chips.o licorice.o cookies.o popcorn.o spinach.o

libgoodies.so: $(MODULES)
$(CXX) -shared $(inputs) -o $(output)

In this case, listing all of the modules that go into "libgoodies.so" is not such a big
deal since there aren't very many of them. But sometimes it can be a real nuisance to
list all of the object files, especially if this list is changing rapidly during
development. Frequently, you want every single module in the whole directory to be
compiled into your program or library. It would be a lot easier if you could just tell
makepp to do that without listing them all.

Well, you can. The above lines could be rewritten as:

libgoodies.so: *.o
$(CXX) -shared $(inputs) -o $(output)

The "*.o" wildcard matches any existing ".o" files, or any ".o" files which do not yet
exist but can be made by any of the rules that makepp knows about from any makefiles that
it has read. So the wildcard will return the same list of files, no matter whether you
haven't compiled anything yet, or whether all the modules have been compiled before.

Of course, if you contaminate your directories with extra files that shouldn't be compiled
directly into your library, (e.g., if you write little test programs and leave them in
same directory as the library source files), then these modules will be incorrectly
included into your library. If you choose to use wildcards, it's up to you to keep the
directory clean enough.

Makepp supports the usual Unix wildcards and one additional one:

" *"
Matches any string of 0 or more characters. It will not match the "/" character. For
example, "a*c" matches "ac", "abc", and "aaaaabc", but not "aa/bc".

"?" Matches exactly one character (not including "/"). For example, "???.o" matches all
filenames that have 3 characters before the ".o" extension.

Matches any of a list of characters at that position. For example, "[abc].o" matches
"a.o", "b.o", "c.o", but not "abc.o" or "d.o". You can also specify a range of
characters, e.g., "data_[0-9]" will match "data_0", "data_1", etc.

" **"
This is a special wildcard, found only in makepp (and the zsh shell, from which I
stole the idea, as bash has done since). It matches any number of intervening
directories. For example, "**/*.o" matches "xyz.o", "test_programs/abc.o", and

If your sources are contained in several subdirectories, and you want to link all the
object modules together, you could write it like this:

liboodles.so: **/*.o
$(CXX) -shared $(inputs) -o $(output)

Functions and Advanced Variable Usage
Makepp has a number of extremely powerful ways of manipulating text. This tutorial shows a
few of the more useful ways, but you might want to glance through makepp_variables and
makepp_functions for a more complete list.

Lists of corresponding files

A common problem in makefiles is the maintenance of two lists of files which correspond.
Consider the following two variables:

SOURCES := a.cpp bc.cpp def.cpp
OBJS := a.o bc.o def.o

We might want to have a list of sources if the makefile can build source distributions,
and we might need a list of objects for the link command. It's tedious to change both
lines whenever a new module is added, and it's not unlikely that a programmer will change
one line and forget to change the other. Here we will show four different ways to avoid
the duplication.

The patsubst function
The first is to use makepp's functions to convert one list into another. A function
invocation looks a little like a variable, except that a function can take arguments:

$(function arg1 arg2 arg3 ...)

Makepp supplies many powerful functions, but probably the most useful of them is the
"patsubst" function. You could write the above lines like this:

SOURCES = a.cpp bc.cpp def.cpp
OBJS = $(patsubst %.cpp, %.o, $(SOURCES))

The "patsubst" function applies a pattern to every word in a list of words, and
performs a simple textual substitution. Any words in the list that match the pattern
in the first argument are put into the output after making the substitution indicated
by the second argument. The "%" wildcard matches any string of 0 or more characters.
In this example, the pattern "%.cpp" is applied to every word in "$(SOURCES)". The
first word, "a.cpp" matches the pattern, and the "%" wildcard matches the string "a".
The "%" in the second argument is then replaced by "a", and the result is "a.o". For
the second argument, "%" matches "bc", so the result is "bc.o".

Makepp's functions can strip directory names, remove extensions, filter out matching
words, return the output from shell commands, and other useful tricks. In addition,
you can also write your own functions in perl that can be called from other parts of
the makefile. See makepp_extending for details.

Substitution references
Since the "patsubst" function is so common, there is an abbreviated syntax for it
called a substitution reference. We could have written the above lines like this:

SOURCES = a.cpp bc.cpp def.cpp
OBJS = $(SOURCES:%.cpp=%.o)
OBJS = $(SOURCES:.cpp=.o) # Shorthand, when both begin with %.

rc-style substitution
Sometimes invocations of "patsubst" or the equivalent substitution references can be
somewhat cryptic. Makepp provides another option which is sometimes more convenient:
rc-style substitution (so called because it was pioneered by the rc shell).

MODULES := a bc def

What happened here is that when it evaluated "$(MODULES).cpp", makepp appended ".cpp"
to every word in "$(MODULES)", and similarly for "$(MODULES).o". In general, any
characters preceding the "$(variable)" (up to a word delimiter) are placed before each
word in "$(variable)", and any characters following "$(variable)" are placed after
each word in "$(variable)". Thus the result of evaluating "x$(MODULES)y" would be
"xay xbcy xdefy".

Inline Perl code
If you know Perl, you can insert Perl code to perform arbitrary manipulations on
variables into your makefile. This is best illustrated by an example:

SOURCES := a.cpp bc.cpp def.cpp
($OBJS = $SOURCES) =~ s/\.cpp/.o/g;

Any text between the "perl_begin" statement and the "perl_end" statement is passed off
to the perl interpreter. You can also use an equivalent more perlish syntax of "perl
{ ... }". All variables in the makefile (except automatic variables) are accessible
as Perl scalars. Any variables you set with Perl code will be accessible in the

So what the above example does is to copy the text from $SOURCES to $OBJS, then
substitute each occurrence of ".cpp" with ".o".

In this example, using inline Perl code is probably unnecessary since there are easier
and clearer ways of doing the same manipulation. But the full power of the perl
interpreter is available if you need it.

Source/Object Separation and Variant Builds

Up to this point all of the makefiles we have seen put the object files in the same
directory as the source files. This is usually the way makefiles are written, and it's
certainly the simplest way to do things. However, suppose you have to compile your
program on both a Linux machine and a Solaris machine. The binaries from the two machines
are incompatible, of course. Unlike the traditional make, makepp is smart enough to know
that if the last compilation was on Linux, and the current compilation is on Solaris, a
recompilation of everything is necessary.

But this still leaves a problem: when you recompile on Solaris, you wipe out your Linux
binaries. Then when you switch back to Linux, you have to recompile everything again,
even though the source files that haven't changed.

A related problem is if you build your program with several different options. Suppose
for example that you usually compile your program with optimization:


%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

my_program: *.o
$(CC) $(inputs) -o $(output)

However, you discover a bug, and you want to enable debugging on all files, so you do
change "CFLAGS":


Makepp realizes that the build commands have changed, and it needs to recompile
everything. But again, recompiling with debugging enabled wipes out your old binaries, so
if you want to turn optimization back on, everything must be recompiled again, even the
files that haven't changed.

The obvious solution to these problems is to put the architecture-dependent or build-
variant-dependent files in a separate subdirectory. There are two basic techniques for
doing this: explicitly specifying an alternate directory, or using repositories.

Explicit specifications of alternate directories

You could rewrite the rules in your makefile to dump the objects into a different
directory, like this:

ARCH ;= $(shell uname -s)-$(shell uname -m)-$(shell uname -r)
# ARCH becomes the output from the uname commands.
# Sometimes people use only $(shell uname -m), but
# this will be the same for FreeBSD and Linux on an
# x86. The -r is not really useful on Linux, but is
# important for other OSes: binaries for SunOS 5.8
# typically won't run on SunOS 5.7. Note the ;= which
# means to evaluate this at most once, when first
# needed.
OBJDIR ;= $(ARCH)-optim

$(OBJDIR)/%.o: %.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $(input) -o $(output)

$(OBJDIR)/my_program: $(OBJDIR)/*.o
$(CC) $(inputs) -o $(output)

Now when you run makepp, "ARCH" is automatically set to something different for each
architecture, and all of the objects are placed in a different directory for each
architecture, so they don't overwrite each other. If you want to recompile turning on
debugging, then you would have to change both "CFLAGS" and "OBJDIR".

One problem with this approach is that implicit loading will no longer work. The only
place that makepp knows to look for a makefile when it needs to build something is in the
directory of the file it's trying to build. If this is a problem for you, then you can
explicitly tell makepp where to look using the "load_makefile" statement.


Repositories are a magical way of using a makefile that is written to put objects in the
same directory, but having makepp automatically put the objects in a different directory.
Suppose we start with the original makefile above (before we modified it to put the
objects in a different directory), and we've been working on Linux so our source directory
is filled with Linux binaries. When we want to recompile our code on Solaris instead of
Linux, we use the following command instead of just typing "makepp":

% mkdir solaris
% cd solaris
% makepp -R ..

What the "-R" option to makepp does in this case is to declare the directory ".." (which
is the original source directory) as a repository. A repository is just a way of getting
makepp to trick all of the actions into believing that all files in one directory tree are
actually located in a different directory tree in the file system. In the above example,
makepp pretends that all the files in ".." (and all subdirectories of "..") are actually
in the current directory (and corresponding subdirectories).

More precisely, a repository is a place where makepp looks if it needs to find a file that
doesn't exist in the current directory tree. If the file exists in the current directory
tree, it is used; if it doesn't exist, but a file exists in the repository, makepp makes a
temporary symbolic link from the file in the repository to the current directory. (A
symbolic link is an alias for the original file. It's like a copy, except that trying to
access the link actually accesses the original file.) The rule actions then act on the
file in the current directory, but actually reference the files in the repository.

In this example, initially we start off with a blank new directory solaris. (It doesn't
have to be blank, of course, and it won't be the second time you run makepp.) Makepp is
run in this directory, and it sees that there is no makefile there. However, there is a
makefile in the repository, so it links in the one from the repository, and reads it. The
pattern rule in the makefile that converts ".c" files into ".o" files causes makepp to
link all the ".c" files that it needs from the repository, and run the compilation command
from the solaris subdirectory. Therefore the ".o" files are now placed into the solaris
subdirectory, not in the top level directory. When the build command is finished, any
files linked from the repository are deleted, so the solaris subdirectory will contain
only the binary files for Solaris. Any ".o" files that exist in the repository are
unmodified, so when you go back to your Linux machine and rerun makepp, most of your
program will not have to be recompiled.

Sometimes it might be more convenient to use a different form of the repository command.
The above three shell commands could be entirely replaced by the following one command:

% makepp -R solaris=. -F solaris

What this does is to say that the files in the current directory are to be linked into the
solaris subdirectory as necessary. (The solaris subdirectory will be created
automatically if it does not exist.) Then the "-F" option causes makepp to cd to the
solaris directory and execute the makefile there (which will be linked from the

Using a repository does not have the same drawbacks as explicitly specifying an object
directory; makefiles will be implicitly loaded as expected, since as far as makepp is
concerned, the makefile actually is in the same directory as the target files. However,
if your build involves not just one but several directory trees, using repositories can
become quite complicated.

Repositories are just a way of pretending that things located at one place in the file
system are actually in a different place for the duration of the build. This is a very
powerful technique that can be used for more than just separating your sources and
binaries. For more details, see makepp_repositories.

Debugging Makefiles
Log File

If you have a complicated build procedure, you find that makepp is rebuilding things more
often than you think they need to be rebuilt. Or you may find that it is not rebuilding
things when it should. You don't have to keep staring at your makefiles until you see the
problem. On every build, makepp produces a log file that explains which rule it thought
it was supposed to use to build each target, what files it thought each target depended
on, and (if it did decide to rebuild) why it thought a rebuild was necessary. This binary
file is viewed makepplog, mppl utility.

The output format is more or less self-explanatory. Indentation conveys depth in makepp's
inference tree. Suppose the target is "all", and "all" depends on "my_program", and
"my_program" depends on "*.o", which depend on the corresponding ".c" files. Log messages
related to "all" will not be indented, log messages related to building the target
"my_program" will be indented two spaces, log messages related to building any of the
object files will be indented 4 spaces, and log messages related to building any of the
source files will be indented 6 spaces.

If you're doing a parallel make (using the "-j" command line option), the order of the
messages in the log file will not make nearly as much sense since messages from different
targets will be interspersed. You might try debugging a serial make first.

Common errors in makefiles

Not specifying all dependencies
Makepp is designed to be extremely clever about finding dependencies, and if you just
use a standard Unix C or C++ compiler command, it is actually somewhat difficult to
get makepp to miss something. (Please send me examples if you find that it missed
something, so I can make makepp smarter.) However, if you are running commands other
than compilation, or dealing with languages other than C or C++, it is much easier to
run into problems.

If you don't tell makepp all of the dependencies of a file, and it can't infer them by
parsing the command line or scanning the files for includes, then it may not rebuild a
file when it should. You can make this kind of error less likely by using only
automatic variables in your actions, rather than repeating the dependency lists. For

combined_file: a b c
do_something a b c d > combined_file

has an error because d is mentioned in the action but not in the dependency list. If
the command had been written using automatic variables like this:

combined_file: a b c d
do_something $(inputs) > combined_file

then it would have been impossible to make this mistake.

Another way that a missing dependency can occur is if a program actually uses a file
but doesn't take the file's name on the command line. For example, if you're
compiling Fortran code, makepp at the moment doesn't know how to scan for included
files. Thus you must explicitly list any files that are included.

One thing that is sometimes helpful for testing is to start with a completely clean
directory--just the bare minimum you think should be necessary--and rebuild absolute
everything from scratch. This can be most conveniently done by using repositories,
like this:

% rm -rf test-build-dir
% makepp -R test-build-dir=. -F test-build-dir

If the build fails because some file is not present, it means that makepp didn't
realize some file was a dependency, because it only links files from the repository
that it thought were needed. Performing this test occasionally may save hours of
debugging later. I have worked on projects where this was never done for months
because recompilation took so long. As a result, many little problems crept in.
There were some object files that didn't have source files any more, some source files
that were never properly rebuilt by a preprocessing command, etc.

Of course, this won't catch all missing dependencies, but it will catch some of them.

Not specifying all targets
You must specify all files that a given command modifies as targets, or else makepp
may not have realized they have changed. You can specify more than one target. For

y.tab.h y.tab.c: parse.y
yacc -d parse.y

If you had forgotten to specify y.tab.h as a target, then makepp would not know to
rebuild y.tab.h using this command, and files that depend on y.tab.h might not be
recompiled after the yacc command is run.

Please suggest things that you have found confusing or dangerous, and I'll either note
them or try to fix makepp so they aren't a danger any more.

Use makepp_tutorial online using onworks.net services

Free Servers & Workstations

Download Windows & Linux apps

  • 1
    Alt-F provides a free and open source
    alternative firmware for the DLINK
    DNS-320/320L/321/323/325/327L and
    DNR-322L. Alt-F has Samba and NFS;
    supports ext2/3/4...
    Download Alt-F
  • 2
    Usm is a unified slackware package
    manager that handles automatic
    dependency resolution. It unifies
    various package repositories including
    slackware, slacky, p...
    Download usm
  • 3
    Chart.js is a Javascript library that
    allows designers and developers to draw
    all kinds of charts using the HTML5
    canvas element. Chart js offers a great
    array ...
    Download Chart.js
  • 4
    iReport-Designer for JasperReports
    iReport-Designer for JasperReports
    NOTE: iReport/Jaspersoft Studio Support
    Announcement: As of version 5.5.0,
    Jaspersoft Studio will be the official
    design client for JasperReports. iReport
    Download iReport-Designer for JasperReports
  • 5
    PostInstallerF will install all the
    software that Fedora Linux and others
    doesn't include by default, after
    running Fedora for the first time. Its
    easy for...
    Download PostInstallerF
  • 6
    The strace project has been moved to
    https://strace.io. strace is a
    diagnostic, debugging and instructional
    userspace tracer for Linux. It is used
    to monitor a...
    Download strace
  • More »

Linux commands